EMET Law Firm
RU EN
AboutApproachCasesResourcesContact
RU EN
International tax / private capital

International tax and private capital advice for clients whose affairs
span jurisdictions.

EMET Law Firm advises private clients and families on international taxation, tax residency, CFC reporting, currency control, private banking, inheritance, and cross-border asset matters.

Average client relationship close to ten years. Long-term adviser to private clients and families.

10
years — average client relationship

Relationships are measured in years, not matters.

Long-term advice matters when tax residency, asset structure, banking compliance, reporting, and family decisions need to work together.

Not a single answer to a single question, but a coherent position across the full picture.

Tax logic

Residency, CFC, filings, and local regimes are sequenced together.

Private capital

Portfolios, property, holdings, and family decisions are checked for compatibility.

Practical delivery

Banks, advisers, and administrators receive one coherent position instead of mismatched replies.

For clients whose personal, tax, and family map does not fit inside one country.

EMET works with entrepreneurs, families, and private clients changing residency, holding assets abroad, answering bank requests, or bringing reporting into order.

Relocation

Change of residency and formation of the tax position in the new jurisdiction.

Reporting

CFC, currency control, foreign accounts, and portfolio income.

Family capital

Inheritance, property, holdings, and interaction with private banks.

International Practice

Eight jurisdictions where relocation, private capital, reporting, and banking compliance most often intersect — the core of the practice, not its limit; work in other jurisdictions on client request.

International practice map Abstract routing lines connecting European jurisdictions relevant to EMET's practice. SpainCyprusItalyGermanyPortugalSwitzerlandGreeceMontenegro

Principal practice map.

CORE

Spain

Residency change under the Beckham law, capital gains, Russian real estate, worldwide reporting.

CORE

Cyprus

Non-dom + 60-day residency, holding jurisdiction, CFC, Cyprus–Switzerland coordination.

CORE

Italy

Standard regime or forfait €300k for Ultra HNWI, inheritance planning, Italy–Switzerland coordination.

NICHE

Germany

Personal income, German real estate, annual reporting, foreign portfolio questions.

NICHE

Portugal

Tax position after NHR 2.0, CFC reporting for relocated families, foreign portfolio income, Russian-side compliance.

NICHE

Switzerland

Private banking compliance, lump-sum taxation, portfolio questions, residency timing.

NICHE

Greece

Article 5A €100k regime, relocation choice, portfolio and reporting questions.

HOME

Montenegro

Home base of the firm, residency, CFC practice, regional coordination.

Selected anonymized matters

Several types of cases from EMET's practice. Identifying facts, exact figures, banks, and personal details have been changed or omitted.

Residential and commercial real estateCFC liquidationWithholding taxSequencing

Group exit from a multi-format real estate portfolio

A group of three clients held a real estate portfolio in one European jurisdiction — the residential part directly, the commercial part through a holding structure shared with local partners. Over time, all sides reached a decision to unwind the project. Several processes had to run in parallel: negotiating exit terms with the local partners on the commercial side, structuring the withholding tax position correctly in the property jurisdiction, liquidating the holding structure, and declaring the corresponding income in the clients' country of residence.

Read in full →
CFC liquidationBanking complianceAsset restructuring

Closing an offshore structure under tightening compliance

A client who had operated through a foreign holding structure with an account at an international private bank found ongoing operations increasingly unpredictable after several waves of compliance tightening across the international banking environment. Each standard transfer required multiple rounds of approvals; the bank requested expanded source-of-funds documentation; some transactions were delayed by weeks.

Read in full →
CFCResidency changeForeign company auditBanking compliance

Building a CFC tax position for a European residency move

A client was changing their tax residency to a European jurisdiction. The asset structure was typical for families at this level: a private offshore company (CFC), personal accounts at a Swiss private bank, and the company's operating accounts at the same bank. The move triggered the standard set of questions: how to declare the CFC correctly in the new country, which local CFC rules applied, how those rules sat alongside the client's continuing obligations in their home jurisdiction, and how to explain the source-of-funds picture to the bank after the residency change.

Read in full →
View all 5 cases →

Resources

Practical notes on CFC, tax residency, reporting, and cross-border private-capital structures.

Spain / CFC / Russian residents abroad / 12 min read

Beckham Law in Spain: how to structure capital and manage tax exposure — a practical guide for high-net-worth clients

A practical guide to Spain's Beckham Law regime: two models of capital ownership, POEM risks, Digital Nomad path, common mistakes.
CFC / Russian residents abroad / 9 min read

Russian tax residency and CFC obligations: when filings begin and end.

How residency status determines whether and when CFC notifications and supporting financial reporting are due.
Portugal / CFC / 10 min read

Portugal and CFC after relocation: why the first year requires separate preparation

After relocation to Portugal, Russian CFC logic and Portuguese CFC logic do not align by calendar. The first Portuguese year requires a separate map of companies and timelines.
CFC / Russian residents abroad / 10 min read

Fixed-profit regime and CFC liquidation: when each option is realistic.

Two practical exits from CFC reporting weight, when each is a fit, and where common timing mistakes happen.

Discuss your situation

A short conversation can clarify which jurisdictions, deadlines, documents, and the composition of assets and income need to be considered together.

eduard@emetlaw.legal +382 63 225 115 WhatsApp +7 977 266 55 06
Email Eduard

CFC

CFC (controlled foreign company) — a foreign entity in which a tax resident of a given jurisdiction holds a controlling stake above the statutory threshold. Most developed tax systems (Russia, EU member states, the United States, the United Kingdom and others) apply their own versions of CFC rules: the controlling person is required to disclose the structure, file financial reporting of the controlled entity and, in defined cases, pay tax on its undistributed profit in their residency country.

The aim of the regime is to prevent artificial profit shifting into a low-tax jurisdiction through a formally foreign but effectively controlled company. The specific thresholds, the scope of obligations and the conditions of undistributed-profit taxation are determined by each jurisdiction individually.

Tax residency

Tax residency — the status that determines in which jurisdiction a person is required to declare worldwide income and pay tax on it. Under the Russian system a person qualifies as a tax resident where they spent 183+ days in Russia within any 12 consecutive months; in other jurisdictions the rules differ and may include day-count tests, centre of vital interests, permanent home and the applicable double-taxation treaty.

Tax residency is not the same as immigration residency. A residence permit, an EU residency card or permanent right to reside does not by itself make a person a tax resident of the jurisdiction — not if they do not physically live there. Conversely, a person can become a tax resident of a country in which they hold no formal residence permit, where they meet the factual tests (for example, spending 183+ days a year there).

Reporting

The body of recurring filings a person submits to the tax authorities of their residency jurisdiction: income tax returns, notifications on foreign accounts and assets, CFC reports and other periodic forms. The logic and frequency of reporting depend on the specific jurisdiction, the form of ownership and the character of the income.

For persons with assets in multiple countries reporting is always layered: the residency country taxes worldwide income, while the countries where the assets are situated retain the primary right to tax local-source income — the same position therefore appears in multiple filings, with double taxation eliminated through the applicable treaties.

Foreign portfolio

The body of a person's investment assets held outside their tax-residency jurisdiction: bank accounts, brokerage portfolios, investment funds, equity stakes in foreign entities, real estate abroad. From the standpoint of the owner's residency country, such a portfolio forms a distinct layer of tax, currency and reporting obligations.

Managing a foreign portfolio intersects with CFC rules, the currency-control regulation of the residency country and automatic exchange of tax information (CRS), under which banks and brokers report client data to the tax authorities of the client's residency jurisdiction.

Inheritance

Inheritance — the formal legal procedure for transferring assets after the owner's death. It is initiated by the opening of the estate, runs through notarial channels and is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which each asset is situated. The procedure involves valuation of the estate, allocation of compulsory shares (under civil law systems), payment of inheritance tax in each country where the assets are located, and registration of the transfer to the heirs. The typical timeline runs from 6 months to 2 years; where multiple jurisdictions are involved, parallel procedures run with mutual legalisation of documents.

A formal inheritance procedure is heavily regulated and often disadvantageous for owners with international wealth. Until the process is complete, a significant share of the estate is effectively frozen — bank accounts are blocked, transfer of real estate requires judicial or notarial action, company shares cannot be sold. Inheritance taxation in a number of jurisdictions is heavy (Germany 7-50%, France up to 60%, the United Kingdom 40%), and reduced personal allowances for non-residents often increase the effective burden further. The procedure is also public, which is incompatible with the level of confidentiality HNWI families typically maintain.

A separate complication is the conflict of legal systems. Assets scattered across different countries are inherited under the rules of each situs jurisdiction, and those rules differ materially: forced-heirship shares (légitime / Pflichtteil) under civil-law systems, formal requirements for a valid will, recognition of foreign marriages and marital contracts, the surviving spouse's entitlements, and procedures for the legalisation of documents. A will valid under Russian law may be only partly recognised by a German, French or Italian court — and vice versa. In an international configuration the testator's wishes may not in fact be executed: they pass through the public-policy filter of each country in which assets are located, and absent a pre-structured arrangement the actual outcome often diverges from the owner's intentions.

Standard practice is therefore to structure the transfer before death, so that assets either fall outside the estate altogether or pass through it in the most efficient form for the family. The main instruments: lifetime gift (Schenkung) with the use of periodically renewing tax-free allowances; family corporate structure (Family GmbH, Familienpool) — transfer of shares in a holding entity rather than the underlying assets; private foundation (Stiftung — Liechtenstein, Austria; Foundation — Panama, Curaçao) — assets are removed from the founder's personal estate; trust (common law jurisdictions) — sits outside the formal estate; joint ownership with right of survivorship in jurisdictions where it is recognised; life and accumulation insurance with named beneficiaries — the pay-out is excluded from the estate in many systems.

The choice of instrument depends on the jurisdiction in which each asset is situated, the tax residency of the testator and the heirs, the family configuration, the nature of the assets (real estate, business interests, portfolio, personal property) and the planning horizon. No universal structure exists; each family is analysed individually.