CORE

Spain

Spain is one of the largest destinations for Russian-speaking HNWI in Europe. Thousands of families from Russia and the CIS have relocated to Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, the Costa del Sol (Málaga, Marbella), and the Balearic Islands. Most of them retain assets in Russia — real estate, operating businesses, investment portfolios held with Swiss private banks, holding structures in Cyprus or BVI.

Context

This configuration — Spanish residency together with Russian and cross-border assets — defines the entire tax picture of the client: which residency regime applies, which declarations are filed, how regional taxes affect the choice of autonomous community, and how banks interpret source of funds. The tax outcome in Spain is largely determined not by residency alone, but by how capital is structured across jurisdictions.

EMET advises Russian-speaking clients in Spain across the full range of tax and legal questions. The sections below describe the principal areas through which almost every client position passes.

01

Who relocates to Spain and why

Most of EMET's clients in Spain fall into one of four categories.

Families with school-age and adolescent children. Lifestyle relocation for permanent residence. The basic drivers: climate, safety, EU residency, Spanish private schools. The decision is often taken before the start of the school year — hence the urgency of planning the tax position before 1 January (when the individual becomes a Spanish tax resident for that tax year).

Entrepreneurs who have sold or transferred management of a Russian business. Relocation as a new chapter of life. A Cyprus holding above a Russian operating company is often retained. Capital sits with a Swiss or other European private bank.

Passive-income clients with Russian rental real estate. Stable rental income from Russia is used to fund living expenses in Spain. The individual rarely visits Russia — non-resident for Russian tax purposes, Spanish resident under Spanish rules.

Capital holders without an active business. A client with an investment portfolio of €5-20M with a Swiss bank, no operating company in Russia, no Russian real estate. The relocation objective is tax efficiency plus EU residency. For this profile Beckham Law tends to be particularly effective — a significant portion of income falls outside the Spanish tax base.

02

Tax regimes for the new resident: an overview

For a new Spanish resident there are two fundamentally different tax paths.

Beckham Law (régimen especial para trabajadores desplazados). For EMET clients with capital outside Spain, Beckham is not a benefit to be checked after relocation — it is the first gate before relocation. If the regime applies, Spain can be considered as a residence jurisdiction without an immediate move into the standard Spanish reporting framework for foreign assets. If the regime does not apply, or the filing window is missed, the client falls into the standard Spanish regime from the start — with a different tax picture, foreign-asset reporting and regional tax consequences. The work therefore begins not with filing the form, but with testing the employment profile, income source, ownership structure and timing of arrival.

This is the principal instrument for most EMET clients with capital outside Spain. A detailed analysis of capital-ownership models, POEM risks, the Digital Nomad path, and procedural matters is published in a separate Resources article: Beckham Law in Spain: how to structure capital.

Standard Spanish residency. If the client does not qualify for Beckham (for example, missed the 6-month window, does not meet the criteria, or consciously chooses the standard regime for long-term residence) — the individual is taxed on worldwide income under the general IRPF (Impuesto sobre la Renta de las Personas Físicas — Spanish personal income tax) scale. Plus the obligations of Modelo 720 (see below), wealth tax, and inheritance tax at regional rates.

The choice between Beckham and standard depends on the composition of assets, the client's planned horizon in Spain, sources of income, and long-term strategy. This decision is part of pre-relocation planning.

03

Modelo 720 and the standard resident's obligations

A standard Spanish resident faces a separate disclosure obligation for foreign assets. Modelo 720 does not create a tax by itself, but it shows the Spanish tax authority the client's external perimeter: where accounts, investment portfolios, real estate and other reportable non-Spanish assets sit. For HNWI this changes the nature of the engagement: the issue is not only the return itself, but consistency with banks, CRS exchange, the previous residence jurisdiction and source-of-funds documentation.

Until 2022 the standard Spanish regime was difficult to use for HNWI with cross-border structures: the Modelo 720 penalty mechanism created disproportionate risk even for technical errors or delays. The CJEU ruling and the Spanish reform that followed changed the risk picture; today the standard regime in Spain is a viable path for clients who do not qualify for Beckham, or who deliberately choose a horizon longer than six years. The specific parameters of the reformed regime are set out in the note alongside.

04

Regional planning: wealth tax and inheritance

Beyond the national level, Spain operates a second layer of choices — each autonomous community sets its own regime on wealth tax (Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio) and inheritance tax (Impuesto de Sucesiones y Donaciones). For an HNWI client this means that the choice of region may shape the final tax burden as much as the choice of country itself: the same family with the same capital can face a materially different picture in Madrid, Andalusia, Catalonia, Valencia or the Balearic Islands.

RegionWealth taxInheritance tax (direct heirs)Planning note
Madrid0% (full bonificación)~0% (full bonificación)Primary destination for HNWI
Andalusia0% (since 2022)~0% (since 2019)Southern equivalent of Madrid
CataloniaStandard rates7–34%Material inheritance burden
ValenciaStandard rates7.65–34%Similar level to Catalonia
Balearic IslandsStandard rates1–20%Moderate but significant on large estates

Beckham residents: wealth tax generally does not apply to foreign assets. Regional differences are relevant for them only in respect of Spanish assets (Spanish real estate, Spanish accounts).

The decision on the autonomous community is reasonably taken at the pre-relocation planning stage — it often turns out to be more important than the choice of country.

05

Banking: where the capital lives

EMET advises clients whose capital is generally held with international private-banking institutions — Swiss, London-based, less frequently other European alternatives. A Spanish bank account for such a client serves an operational role: living expenses, mortgage or rent payments, school fees. The principal capital and investment work remain outside Spain.

In a Spanish relocation, the banking work usually starts not with opening a Spanish account, but with aligning the Spanish tax position with the client's existing private-banking relationships. The Swiss bank needs to understand why the client became Spanish resident, which regime applies, which assets are disclosed in Spain and how this aligns with the source-of-funds history. The Spanish operating account is only the visible part of the move; the main burden falls on preparing the documentation for banks outside Spain.

The compliance side of the work divides accordingly. The bulk of the work consists of inquiries from Swiss banks regarding source of funds, residency status, and declared income; these arrive regularly after the client's relocation and require a coherent position prepared for review. Inquiries from Spanish banks (opening an operational account, routine verifications) are occasional and are usually handled via local gestores in coordination with EMET.

06

Common client configurations

EMET in Spain works with variations of several typical setups.

Configuration A — Family with Russian real estate and a Swiss portfolio

The client is a Spanish resident under Beckham law. In Russia — one or more apartments held for rent. In Switzerland — a portfolio of €2-5M with a private bank. In Cyprus — a holding company through which investments have historically been structured. EMET prepares and files the annual Spanish returns, manages inquiries from Swiss banks regarding source of funds, and runs the client's Russian side — CFC reporting, foreign-account notifications, currency control.

Configuration B — Entrepreneur with the sale of a Russian business

The client is preparing to sell, or has just sold, an operating company in Russia. Capital-gains tax may be paid in Russia — depending on the ownership structure of the asset (whether the seller is a Russian-resident individual selling directly, or a foreign holding company through which the business has been held). The key practical question is what burden will arise on the Spanish side: Beckham status and the timing of the sale relative to the moment of Spanish tax residency determine whether a Spanish top-up will arise (with credit for any Russian tax actually paid) or whether the entire gain will fall into the Spanish base. EMET designs the exit route from the business, aligns the timing of the sale with the timing of relocation, and runs both tax sides so that the total burden remains as low as possible within the applicable rules.

Configuration C — Passive-income owner with delegated management

The Russian business remains in ownership but has been transferred to operational management of a third party. Income is passive (dividends). In Spain, the Beckham regime generally takes most foreign passive income outside the Spanish tax base. The actual scope of protection depends on the ownership structure, the holding's jurisdiction and the Spanish rules on controlled foreign companies — analysed separately for each client.

Configuration D — Capital holder without an active business

A client with an investment portfolio of €5-20M with a Swiss bank, without an operating company or significant Russian real estate. Beckham law tends to be particularly effective — a significant portion of income falls outside the Spanish tax base. EMET's principal task is to determine whether the client's current ownership structure (including any controlled foreign holding companies through which capital has historically been held) delivers the full set of Beckham preferences, or whether it requires restructuring before relocation.

Configuration E — Multi-generational capital and inheritance planning

This segment is becoming increasingly relevant as the first generation of Russian-speaking HNWI who relocated to Spain in recent years begins to plan the transfer of capital to the next generation. Several family members across different jurisdictions, common family capital, an inheritance structure that requires a coherent tax position. Here the choice of autonomous community (Madrid / Andalusia) for inheritance tax becomes a central planning factor, alongside the holding structure. EMET advises on multi-generational configurations and coordinated structures for heirs across different jurisdictions.

07

How EMET works with clients in Spain

The standard cycle of advising a client in Spain consists of four phases.

Pre-relocation planning (6-12 months before the move)

Analysis of the existing active and passive structure. Decisions on the choice of regime (Beckham vs standard), on the timing of relocation against the tax year, on the choice of autonomous community (Madrid / Andalusia / others). Preparation for the Beckham application. Coordination with the Russian side on the timing of asset sales or restructuring.

Setup phase (the first 3-6 months in Spain)

Obtaining NIE, registration at an address, arranging Beckham or preparing standard tax registration. Opening a Spanish operational account. Preparing the first Modelo 720 filing (for standard residents). Coordination with a local gestor or tax adviser on technical matters.

Annual engagement

Modelo 720 (by 31 March, for standard residents), IRPF (by 30 June), wealth tax (with IRPF, for standard residents in applicable regions), CFC and currency control on the Russian side. Responses to inquiries from Swiss and Spanish banks. Ongoing tracking of legislative and regulatory changes — particularly the regional wealth-tax bonificaciones, which evolve.

Long-horizon planning

For Beckham clients — preparation for exit from the regime (in year seven): restructuring, relocation to another jurisdiction, or transition into the full Spanish regime. Inheritance planning. EMET begins discussing these decisions in years four or five of Beckham, so that there is time to restructure without haste.

EMET coordinates with local Spanish advisers — a gestor for routine work, a Spanish tax lawyer for complex questions, a Spanish notary for transactions. The client remains with one adviser seeing the full picture; local experts are engaged on a point basis for technical matters.

08

Note on applicability

The mechanisms above are a framing picture. The concrete tax outcome in any given situation depends on the owner's residency status, the regime selected (Beckham or standard), the autonomous community of residence, the form of asset ownership, the applicable double-taxation treaty in its current state, and the residency history. Determining the actual regime calls for individual analysis against the specific structure and factual history.

Topics

If your position involves relocation to Spain or established Spanish residency — the composition of assets, the choice of regime, the choice of region, banking compliance, coordination with the Russian side — a preliminary discussion will help frame the overall position before decisions are taken on individual elements.

Contact EMET

CFC

CFC (controlled foreign company) — a foreign entity in which a tax resident of a given jurisdiction holds a controlling stake above the statutory threshold. Most developed tax systems (Russia, EU member states, the United States, the United Kingdom and others) apply their own versions of CFC rules: the controlling person is required to disclose the structure, file financial reporting of the controlled entity and, in defined cases, pay tax on its undistributed profit in their residency country.

The aim of the regime is to prevent artificial profit shifting into a low-tax jurisdiction through a formally foreign but effectively controlled company. The specific thresholds, the scope of obligations and the conditions of undistributed-profit taxation are determined by each jurisdiction individually.

Tax residency

Tax residency — the status that determines in which jurisdiction a person is required to declare worldwide income and pay tax on it. Under the Russian system a person qualifies as a tax resident where they spent 183+ days in Russia within any 12 consecutive months; in other jurisdictions the rules differ and may include day-count tests, centre of vital interests, permanent home and the applicable double-taxation treaty.

Tax residency is not the same as immigration residency. A residence permit, an EU residency card or permanent right to reside does not by itself make a person a tax resident of the jurisdiction — not if they do not physically live there. Conversely, a person can become a tax resident of a country in which they hold no formal residence permit, where they meet the factual tests (for example, spending 183+ days a year there).

Reporting

The body of recurring filings a person submits to the tax authorities of their residency jurisdiction: income tax returns, notifications on foreign accounts and assets, CFC reports and other periodic forms. The logic and frequency of reporting depend on the specific jurisdiction, the form of ownership and the character of the income.

For persons with assets in multiple countries reporting is always layered: the residency country taxes worldwide income, while the countries where the assets are situated retain the primary right to tax local-source income — the same position therefore appears in multiple filings, with double taxation eliminated through the applicable treaties.

Foreign portfolio

The body of a person's investment assets held outside their tax-residency jurisdiction: bank accounts, brokerage portfolios, investment funds, equity stakes in foreign entities, real estate abroad. From the standpoint of the owner's residency country, such a portfolio forms a distinct layer of tax, currency and reporting obligations.

Managing a foreign portfolio intersects with CFC rules, the currency-control regulation of the residency country and automatic exchange of tax information (CRS), under which banks and brokers report client data to the tax authorities of the client's residency jurisdiction.

Inheritance

Inheritance — the formal legal procedure for transferring assets after the owner's death. It is initiated by the opening of the estate, runs through notarial channels and is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which each asset is situated. The procedure involves valuation of the estate, allocation of compulsory shares (under civil law systems), payment of inheritance tax in each country where the assets are located, and registration of the transfer to the heirs. The typical timeline runs from 6 months to 2 years; where multiple jurisdictions are involved, parallel procedures run with mutual legalisation of documents.

A formal inheritance procedure is heavily regulated and often disadvantageous for owners with international wealth. Until the process is complete, a significant share of the estate is effectively frozen — bank accounts are blocked, transfer of real estate requires judicial or notarial action, company shares cannot be sold. Inheritance taxation in a number of jurisdictions is heavy (Germany 7-50%, France up to 60%, the United Kingdom 40%), and reduced personal allowances for non-residents often increase the effective burden further. The procedure is also public, which is incompatible with the level of confidentiality HNWI families typically maintain.

A separate complication is the conflict of legal systems. Assets scattered across different countries are inherited under the rules of each situs jurisdiction, and those rules differ materially: forced-heirship shares (légitime / Pflichtteil) under civil-law systems, formal requirements for a valid will, recognition of foreign marriages and marital contracts, the surviving spouse's entitlements, and procedures for the legalisation of documents. A will valid under Russian law may be only partly recognised by a German, French or Italian court — and vice versa. In an international configuration the testator's wishes may not in fact be executed: they pass through the public-policy filter of each country in which assets are located, and absent a pre-structured arrangement the actual outcome often diverges from the owner's intentions.

Standard practice is therefore to structure the transfer before death, so that assets either fall outside the estate altogether or pass through it in the most efficient form for the family. The main instruments: lifetime gift (Schenkung) with the use of periodically renewing tax-free allowances; family corporate structure (Family GmbH, Familienpool) — transfer of shares in a holding entity rather than the underlying assets; private foundation (Stiftung — Liechtenstein, Austria; Foundation — Panama, Curaçao) — assets are removed from the founder's personal estate; trust (common law jurisdictions) — sits outside the formal estate; joint ownership with right of survivorship in jurisdictions where it is recognised; life and accumulation insurance with named beneficiaries — the pay-out is excluded from the estate in many systems.

The choice of instrument depends on the jurisdiction in which each asset is situated, the tax residency of the testator and the heirs, the family configuration, the nature of the assets (real estate, business interests, portfolio, personal property) and the planning horizon. No universal structure exists; each family is analysed individually.